2016
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2016.2561961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Channel Error Calibration Algorithm for Azimuth Multichannel SAR Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By multiplying by the conjugate of P (f ), H (f ) can be made independent with Doppler frequency [15] and (4) is transformed to:…”
Section: Model Of Multi-channel Sar Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By multiplying by the conjugate of P (f ), H (f ) can be made independent with Doppler frequency [15] and (4) is transformed to:…”
Section: Model Of Multi-channel Sar Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the covariance matrix of multi-channel SAR can be estimated from the sample covariance matrix R, which is the statistical average along the range dimension. Here, since the steering vectorH is independent of Doppler frequency, R can then be estimated along both range dimension and Doppler dimension [15]. As a result, the computational load will be significantly reduced and the SNR will increase, which is beneficial to the estimation of PI errors.…”
Section: Model Of Multi-channel Sar Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, a decreased number of activated elements reduces the transmit antenna gain and the transmit signal power. Secondly, azimuth channel errors can be compensated for by many recently proposed compensation methods [18,19,20]. However, since factors such as the manufacturing process, temperature and radiation that affect the characteristics of antenna are not fixed, these methods are unable to perfectly estimate or compensate for multichannel errors, especially when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the obtained raw data is not high enough.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%