1995
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00218-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved chromatographic analysis of volatile sulfur compounds by the static headspace technique on water-alcohol solutions and brandies with chemiluminescence detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method has seldom been employed in the determination of environmental samples because of its low sensitivity and poor response to VSCs such as H 2 S, OCS, and CS 2 . For the analysis of a variety of VSCs at trace levels, a wide range of sulfur-selective detectors, including flame photometric detector (FPD) [12], pulsed flame photometric detector (PFPD) [13,14], sulfur chemoluminescence detector (SCD) [15], and atomic emission detector (AED) [16], together with a universal mass spectrometry mass selective detector (MSD) [17,18] have been widely applied in VSC analysis. However, in most cases, these instruments are impractical due to technical problems (PFPD and SCD) or high costs (AED and MSD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this method has seldom been employed in the determination of environmental samples because of its low sensitivity and poor response to VSCs such as H 2 S, OCS, and CS 2 . For the analysis of a variety of VSCs at trace levels, a wide range of sulfur-selective detectors, including flame photometric detector (FPD) [12], pulsed flame photometric detector (PFPD) [13,14], sulfur chemoluminescence detector (SCD) [15], and atomic emission detector (AED) [16], together with a universal mass spectrometry mass selective detector (MSD) [17,18] have been widely applied in VSC analysis. However, in most cases, these instruments are impractical due to technical problems (PFPD and SCD) or high costs (AED and MSD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [22], static headspace (HS) [15], and dynamic HS (purge and trap) preconcentration methods had been the most widely used techniques for the determination of sulfur compounds [23,24]. Each of these methods has significant disadvantages, which can include excessive solvent use, low efficiency, or expensive equipment, as well as being tedious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is usually difficult to characterize them using the more popular detection systems (flame ionization or mass spectrometry) in GC. They are now easily detected or quantified using specific detectors: flame photometry (FPD) (Darriet et al, 1995;Mestres et al, 1998Mestres et al, , 1999 or sulphur chemiluminescence (SCD) (Nedjma and Maujean, 1995). Extractions are commonly carried out by liquid-liquid extraction, static headspace, dynamic headspace or, more recently, by solid-phase microextraction (Mestres et al, 2000).…”
Section: Sulphur Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fases não polares, como polissiloxanos, são recomendadas para separação desses compostos. [90][91][92] Hutte et al 93 avaliaram o efeito da espessura do filme de fase estacionária de metil silicone, comprimento da coluna e diâmetro interno na determinação de compostos de enxofre. Colunas com filmes de 4 a 5 μm oferecem uma boa separação dos compostos voláteis de enxofre e são melhor adaptadas às análises de baixas concentrações destes em matrizes gasosas, pois estes filmes retêm solutos altamente voláteis por um tempo mais longo, fazendo com que a separação ocorra em um tempo maior.…”
Section: Cromatografia Gasosaunclassified