2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved CO2 separation performance of composite membrane with the aids of low-temperature plasma treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neat and MMMs exhibited a broad peak at around 20.7° and a comparatively narrow diffraction peak in the region of 24.0° corresponding to the soft PE segments and hard PA segments of Pebax with d ‐spacing of 4.36 and 3.70 Å, respectively. The narrow peak at 24° is the characteristic peak of the Pebax and reported in literature [51,52] . It is interesting to note that, initially the addition of g ‐PTAP (wt.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The neat and MMMs exhibited a broad peak at around 20.7° and a comparatively narrow diffraction peak in the region of 24.0° corresponding to the soft PE segments and hard PA segments of Pebax with d ‐spacing of 4.36 and 3.70 Å, respectively. The narrow peak at 24° is the characteristic peak of the Pebax and reported in literature [51,52] . It is interesting to note that, initially the addition of g ‐PTAP (wt.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Robust human development in power plants and industrial production has paved the way for the rapid increase in CO 2 emissions. , Hence, there is an increasing demand for advanced technologies to efficiently capture and purify CO 2 emissions. CO 2 capture and separation technologies have been divided into absorption, , permeation, low temperature, membrane separation, , and other techniques. Many techniques have been used to capture CO 2 from exhaust gases; among them, an absorption packed column based on a gas–liquid contactor is the most common configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peaks at 1735 and 1637 cm −1 were assigned to the free CO and hydrogen bonded CO in HNCO, respectively. 1200 cm −1 was the asymmetric CO stretching vibration 28 . For PVDF/SPEEK composite membrane, the characteristic peaks of the sulfonic group can be clearly observed from the Figure 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1200 cm −1 was the asymmetric C O stretching vibration. 28 For PVDF/SPEEK composite membrane, the characteristic peaks of the sulfonic group can be clearly observed from the Figure 10. The peaks at 1022 cm −1 was the symmetric stretching vibration peak of sulfonate group O S O, and around 1078 cm −1 was the stretching absorption peak of S O.…”
Section: Ftir Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 92%