2014
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved contractility with tepid modified full blood cardioplegia compared with cold crystalloid cardioplegia in a piglet model

Abstract: This randomized animal study proves feasibility and safety of MBC for paediatric use. Haemodynamic evaluation and cardiac markers did not show inferiority to standard CCC. Moreover, MBC seems to be associated with superior contractility post bypass, which encourages us to use MBC in paediatric patients in the near future.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recovery of cardiac function after cardiac arrest was better after BCP, and the infarct size was smaller. Our results support the previous findings of Münch et al who observed superior contractility after ischemia with BCP in a piglet model [18], Feng et al who reported less apoptosis, preserved left ventricular function, and lower coronary resistance after BCP in a rabbit model [11], and Runge et al who found more rapid normalization of myocardial metabolism in a porcine model [12]; all of these experiments were conducted without myocardial infarction. Julia et al [13], Vinten-Johansen [14], and Catinella et al [15] showed superiority of BCP over CCP, with better recovery of contractile function after BCP in dog heart infarction models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recovery of cardiac function after cardiac arrest was better after BCP, and the infarct size was smaller. Our results support the previous findings of Münch et al who observed superior contractility after ischemia with BCP in a piglet model [18], Feng et al who reported less apoptosis, preserved left ventricular function, and lower coronary resistance after BCP in a rabbit model [11], and Runge et al who found more rapid normalization of myocardial metabolism in a porcine model [12]; all of these experiments were conducted without myocardial infarction. Julia et al [13], Vinten-Johansen [14], and Catinella et al [15] showed superiority of BCP over CCP, with better recovery of contractile function after BCP in dog heart infarction models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with most of the existing literature. 5,7,8,13 In our study, significant CKMB release was defined as a value above 80 µg/L. Braathen et al 9 found higher CKMB levels in patients receiving CC vs BC, but the levels reported were lower than our cut-off point (CC: 56.1 vs BC: 29.3 µg/L).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…When the data was pooled, no significant difference was seen in the results of Sá et al whereas Guru et al found a significant reduction in low cardiac output syndrome in favour of BC. Others also report improved cardiac status when BC is used: Münch et al 13 describe better preload independent contractility (this was an animal study on piglets) and Luciani et al 14 a lower incidence of acute right heart failure (but no difference in predischarge ventricular kinetics) in transplanted patients who received BC. In general, inotropes are used in our department when the clinician suspects impaired cardiac function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better postoperative myocardial contractility was reported after blood cardioplegia administration [ 24 , 25 ]. Due to the incompleteness of echocardiographic data this parameter was not included in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%