2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3072489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Controller and Design Method for Grid-Connected Three-Phase Differential SEPIC Inverter

Abstract: Single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC) based differential inverters (SEPIC-BDI) have received wide concerns in renewable energy applications due to their modularity, galvanic isolation, decreased power stages, continuous input current, and step up/down capability. However, its design still has several challenges related to component design, the existence of complex right half plane (RHP) zeros, and increased sensitivity to component mismatches. In this context, this paper presents an improved control … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, differential based three-phase inverters usually offer a low operating efficiency compared with Dual-Active-Bridge based systems due to the existence of low-order harmonics and the voltage stress, which results from the voltage boosting property in a single-stage operation. According to previous literatures, average efficiency of differential-based three-phase inverters based on (Cuk, SEPIC,....) is between (86-91%) [6], [33], [37]. On the other hand, grid-connected three-phase DC-AC inverters based on matrix or dual-activebridge converters usually exhibit efficiency in the range of (94% to 97%) depending on the utilized switch type (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, differential based three-phase inverters usually offer a low operating efficiency compared with Dual-Active-Bridge based systems due to the existence of low-order harmonics and the voltage stress, which results from the voltage boosting property in a single-stage operation. According to previous literatures, average efficiency of differential-based three-phase inverters based on (Cuk, SEPIC,....) is between (86-91%) [6], [33], [37]. On the other hand, grid-connected three-phase DC-AC inverters based on matrix or dual-activebridge converters usually exhibit efficiency in the range of (94% to 97%) depending on the utilized switch type (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a conventional PI-based grid-currents control loop is used for grid currents regulation [32]. In [33], the authors proposed three-phase SEPIC differential inverter for PV applications. However, the presented structure requires increased number of passive elements that enlarges converter size and footprint and increases its cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a phase-controlled i-AFE based on three 2×2 matrix converters results in the use of 36 active semiconductors [147], [148]. To reduce the number of components in phase-controlled solutions, SEPIC-based [149], [150], and cascaded full-bridge converters [151]- [153] were proposed.…”
Section: Phase-controlled Single-stage I-afementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, an impressive inverter topology based on buck, boost, or buck-boost DC-DC modules is presented and known as differential inverter. It shows noteworthy success in the power electronics industry due to their modularity, single-stage, and bidirectional power conversion with step-up/down ability [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. Further, unlike the abovementioned single-stage inverter topologies, differential inverters provide galvanic isolation between source and load by integrating small HFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%