2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-5442(01)00056-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved cookstoves in rural India: how improved are they?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In India, residential biofuel combustion represents the dominant energy sector and accounts for over 50 % of the total source of BC and OC emissions (Klimont et al, 2009). India has a long history of unsuccessful stove intervention programs that have sometimes focused on health benefits (Hanbar and Karve, 2002;Kanagawa and Nakata, 2007;Kishore and Ramana, 2002). Despite years of interventions, the vast majority of Indian households still rely on traditional stoves (Legros et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In India, residential biofuel combustion represents the dominant energy sector and accounts for over 50 % of the total source of BC and OC emissions (Klimont et al, 2009). India has a long history of unsuccessful stove intervention programs that have sometimes focused on health benefits (Hanbar and Karve, 2002;Kanagawa and Nakata, 2007;Kishore and Ramana, 2002). Despite years of interventions, the vast majority of Indian households still rely on traditional stoves (Legros et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the case in India under the National Program on Improved Cookstoves, when Cookstove Approval Committees mandated strict performance characteristics that became instantiated within regional stove models (Rehman and Malhotra, 2004;Simon, 2010). Inadequate assessment of household stove preferences led many households to discard stove models within a matter of months (Hanbar and Karve, 2002;Kishore and Ramana, 2002). Quite differently, Rollinde (2009) notes how recent programs in the Indian states of Gujarat and Karnataka were successful due to diverse product lines, decentralized procurement of stoves, and ongoing collaboration with local agencies to refine specific design qualities.…”
Section: Rigid Stove Design Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet prior progress has been slow, and to date these efforts have not successfully reached scale. For example, the largest program implemented by the Indian government, the National Programme on Improved Chulhas (NPIC), which disseminated some 30 million stoves, is widely regarded as a failure [9,10,11]. Furthermore, recent evaluations of several efforts to promote ICS in South Asia suggest that their purported benefits may not have been realized [12,13], though more success has been reported elsewhere, e.g., in Sub-Saharan Africa [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%