2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-006-0037-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Coupling of Finite Shell Elements and 3D Boundary Elements

Abstract: A strategy for the mixed-dimensional coupling of finite shell elements and 3D boundary elements is presented. The stiffness formulation for the boundary element domain is generated by the 3D symmetric Galerkin boundary element method and thus can be assembled to the global finite element formulation. Based on the equality of work at the coupling interface, coupling equations in an integral sense are derived for curved coupling interfaces and formulated as multipoint constraints in terms of kinematic quantities… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coupling approaches can be either FEM-driven or BEM-driven. In the former, the BEM subdomain is interpreted as a macro finite element that can be assembled easily to the FEM stiffness matrix Haas, Helldörfer, and Kuhn (2006); Mouhoubi (2000) and the global matrix equation is solved as a FE system. By contrast, the latter option, the FE subdomain contribution is incorporated into a boundary element system, see Brebbia and Georgiou (1979); Zienkiewicz, Kelly, and Bettess (1977).…”
Section: Grid Reinforcement By Fem-bem Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling approaches can be either FEM-driven or BEM-driven. In the former, the BEM subdomain is interpreted as a macro finite element that can be assembled easily to the FEM stiffness matrix Haas, Helldörfer, and Kuhn (2006); Mouhoubi (2000) and the global matrix equation is solved as a FE system. By contrast, the latter option, the FE subdomain contribution is incorporated into a boundary element system, see Brebbia and Georgiou (1979); Zienkiewicz, Kelly, and Bettess (1977).…”
Section: Grid Reinforcement By Fem-bem Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary objective is to compromise between the requirement of computational resources and accuracy of predicted results. Within the context of linear elasticity, there have been several investigations directed towards the coupling of the conventional BEM and the standard FEM e.g., 24-26 and the coupling of the strongly singular SGBEM and the standard FEM e.g., [27][28][29][30] . It should be emphasized that the former type of coupling procedure generally destroys the desirable symmetric feature of the entire system of linear algebraic equations whereas the latter type requires special numerical treatment of strongly and hyper singular integrals e.g., 31,32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S IB = S IF = S IR ) and there is, of course, no distinction between a point y and its closest point projection onto one of the surfaces. The weak-form statements of the continuity conditions are then equivalent to the strong-form statements (25)- (27) and it follows that E ≡ 0. However, in the context of a numerical implementation in which the three interfaces are discretized separately, the quantity E does not in general vanish; a discussion of the error involved in discarding this term will be given further below after the numerical implementation of the method is described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%