2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved dc programming approaches for solving the quadratic eigenvalue complementarity problem

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss the solution of a Quadratic Eigenvalue Complementarity Problem (QEiCP) by using Difference of Convex (DC) programming approaches. We first show that QEiCP can be represented as dc programming problem. Then we investigate different dc programming formulations of QEiCP and discuss their dc algorithms based on a well-known method -DCA. A new local dc decomposition is proposed which aims at constructing a better dc decomposition regarding to the specific feature of the target problem in s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Holy Grail which motivates the research in this paper is to solve polynomial optimization via DC programming approaches. As an application, we have applied in [29] our DCSOS decomposition Algorithm 4.2 to solve the quadratic eigenvalue complementarity problem (a fourthordered polynomial optimization) using DCA, the numerical results demonstrated a good performance of DCA on both the convergence rate and the quality of the computed solutions which outperformed many existing methods. The next step, we are going to develop DC programming algorithms for solving general polynomial optimization (involving convex constrained polynomial optimization and nonconvex polynomial constrained polynomial optimization).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Holy Grail which motivates the research in this paper is to solve polynomial optimization via DC programming approaches. As an application, we have applied in [29] our DCSOS decomposition Algorithm 4.2 to solve the quadratic eigenvalue complementarity problem (a fourthordered polynomial optimization) using DCA, the numerical results demonstrated a good performance of DCA on both the convergence rate and the quality of the computed solutions which outperformed many existing methods. The next step, we are going to develop DC programming algorithms for solving general polynomial optimization (involving convex constrained polynomial optimization and nonconvex polynomial constrained polynomial optimization).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another open question is how to find the best DC decomposition for DCA. We have understood by now in our recent work [29] that a best DC decomposition for DCA must be an undominated DC decomposition whose DC components are undominated convex functions. However, how to generate undominated DC decomposition for polynomials is still an open question which requires more investigations in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason is that when ρ is too big, the DC components ρ 2 x 2 and ρ 2 x 2 −f (x) are more convex. We have proved in (Niu, 2018;Niu et al, 2019) that a better DC decomposition must be an undominated DC decomposition whose DC components should be less convex as possible.…”
Section: Programming Formulation For (Mvsk) Model Via Sums-of-squaresmentioning
confidence: 99%