2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-021-01668-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved degradation of metronidazole in a heterogeneous photo-Fenton oxidation system with PAC/Fe3O4 magnetic catalyst: biodegradability, catalyst specifications, process optimization, and degradation pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison with Other Catalysts. The catalytic performance of the as-prepared CuO•Fe 3 O 4 /SiO 2 composite was compared with other catalysts recently studied on the removal of persistent organic compounds in water such as Fenton [1,[69][70][71], electro-Fenton [10,13,25,[72][73][74][75], photocatalyst [22,76], and adsorption [11,[28][29][30]77]. The reaction conditions and decomposition efficiency of these catalysts are listed in Table 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison with Other Catalysts. The catalytic performance of the as-prepared CuO•Fe 3 O 4 /SiO 2 composite was compared with other catalysts recently studied on the removal of persistent organic compounds in water such as Fenton [1,[69][70][71], electro-Fenton [10,13,25,[72][73][74][75], photocatalyst [22,76], and adsorption [11,[28][29][30]77]. The reaction conditions and decomposition efficiency of these catalysts are listed in Table 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that 99.52% of the variability in the 2,4-DNT removal by DBD/Fe–RGO–BiVO 4 process can be explained by the model. As manifested in Table 3 , the slight difference between the R 2 and R 2 Adj implies that non-significant terms have a little chance to be included in the model 37 . …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen factorial ( 2 n ) and 8 axial (2n) and 6 center point experimental runs were conducted (Table 2). The distance of axial points (± α ) to center point (CP) is calculated as follows [41, 42]: (1) ± α = 2 n 1 4 . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%