2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved determination of the myelin water fraction in human brain using magnetic resonance imaging through Bayesian analysis of mcDESPOT

Abstract: Myelin water fraction (MWF) mapping with magnetic resonance imaging has led to the ability to directly observe myelination and demyelination in both the developing brain and in disease. Multicomponent driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 and T2 (mcDESPOT) has been proposed as a rapid approach for multicomponent relaxometry and has been applied to map MWF in human brain. However, even for the simplest two-pool signal model consisting of MWF and non-myelin-associated water, the dimensionality of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
91
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(116 reference statements)
4
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work is based on the use of the BMC-mcDESPOT protocol previously described for HR mapping of MWF in the brain, in which data collected according to the mcDESPOT protocol is analyzed using Bayesian methods and a corrected signal model [14, 17]. We note that while the basic methodology for BMC-mcDESPOT has been presented previously [12, 14], there are significant challenges involved in applying this approach to cartilage, with its much shorter T 2 values, higher noise due to HR imaging and strong susceptibility effects as compared to brain. Our work builds on previously published use of mcDESPOT for PgWF determination in human cartilage at substantially lower spatial resolution [4, 5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our work is based on the use of the BMC-mcDESPOT protocol previously described for HR mapping of MWF in the brain, in which data collected according to the mcDESPOT protocol is analyzed using Bayesian methods and a corrected signal model [14, 17]. We note that while the basic methodology for BMC-mcDESPOT has been presented previously [12, 14], there are significant challenges involved in applying this approach to cartilage, with its much shorter T 2 values, higher noise due to HR imaging and strong susceptibility effects as compared to brain. Our work builds on previously published use of mcDESPOT for PgWF determination in human cartilage at substantially lower spatial resolution [4, 5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of full simulations indicating the improved performance of BMC- as compared to SRC-mcDESPOT was presented in Refs. [11, 12, 14] for a wide range of tissue parameters and SNRs, including input values encompassing typical and plausible parameters for cartilage analysis. Thus, while precision may be evaluated from the reproducibility of our human cartilage results, accuracy can be determined by the results of these simulation analyses performed with known input parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations