2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved dielectric breakdown strength and energy storage properties in Er2O3 modified Sr0.35Bi0.35K0.25TiO3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these might require an in-depth 32BLT ceramics and other recently reported bulk ceramics. [2][3][4][5][31][32][33][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] The red star and the purple star represent the energy-storage properties of 0.68NN-0.32BLT and 0.68NN-0.32BT ceramics, respectively. The P-E loops for c) pure NN and d) 0.68NN-0.32BT/BLT ceramics measured under their E test-max at 10 Hz; e) a comparison of E test-max , P max , W rec , and η values between pure NN and 0.68NN-0.32BT/BLT ceramics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these might require an in-depth 32BLT ceramics and other recently reported bulk ceramics. [2][3][4][5][31][32][33][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] The red star and the purple star represent the energy-storage properties of 0.68NN-0.32BLT and 0.68NN-0.32BT ceramics, respectively. The P-E loops for c) pure NN and d) 0.68NN-0.32BT/BLT ceramics measured under their E test-max at 10 Hz; e) a comparison of E test-max , P max , W rec , and η values between pure NN and 0.68NN-0.32BT/BLT ceramics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1. a,b) The comparison of energy-storage properties between 0.68NN-0.32BLT ceramics and other recently reported bulk ceramics [2][3][4][5][31][32][33][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. The red star and the purple star represent the energy-storage properties of 0.68NN-0.32BLT and 0.68NN-0.32BT ceramics, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, poor energy storage performances (W rec < 3 J cm −3 and η < 80%) have been obtained in BKT-based ceramics, which should be mainly attributed to the insufficient E b (<25 kV mm −1 ) of the poor-quality samples although hot press sintering and rolling technique have been used. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Thus it is difficult for BKT-based materials to compete with classic systems such as BaTiO 3 (BT), [27][28][29][30][31] BNT, [7,[32][33][34] NN, [8,35,36] AN, [5,6,37] and BiFeO 3 (BF) [16,38] in the field of energy storage because of the features of difficult preparation, low density, and volatile elements. Except the local structure design, the improvement of sample quality should be the most important way to enhance the energy storage properties of BKT-based ceramics, which could be directly reflected on the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, the capacitor discharges through an applied resistance. The electric energy would be stored and released through the above physical process. Generally speaking, there are three fundamental parameters used to represent the energy storage performance, that is, the total energy storage density ( W t ), the discharging energy storage density ( W d ), and efficiency (η), which are denoted on the basis of the following formulas, , where P max is the maximum polarization value, P r is the remnant polarization value, and E is the applied electric field strength, respectively. Consequently, high P m , low P r , and enhanced breakdown strength ( E B ) are conducive to achieving a large W d value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%