2015
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2015.1016945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved double acceptance sampling plan based on truncated life test for some popular statistical distributions

Abstract: In this paper, a modified double acceptance sampling plan for time-truncated life test is developed. The operating procedure of this plan is also proposed and the performance measures such as the probability of acceptance and the average sample number (ASN) are also derived. We consider gamma distribution, Weibull distribution and Birnbaum--Saunders distribution for designing the proposed plan. The optimal parameters are determined which will have minimum ASN. The efficiency of the proposed plan is also discus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This form of life test is known as time truncated life test. As time truncated life test helps the quality inspector to ensure products' quality where the lifetime is a specified quality characteristic, several authors have designed different sampling plans such as SSP, DSP, modified DSP, special purpose sampling plans, etc., for lot sentencing based on the results obtained through time truncated life test (see for example, Lio et al (2010), Rao et al (2012), Al-Omari (2014), Al-Omari et al (2016, Aslam et al (2013Aslam et al ( , 2016, Aslam et al (2017), Balamurali et al (2017a, b), Al-Omari et al (2018, Kannan et al (2022), Shrahili et al (2021), Alomani and Al-Omari (2022)). Such sampling plans have been designed to ensure the mean and median life of the products under various statistical distributions (see Table 1).…”
Section: Ijqrm 415mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This form of life test is known as time truncated life test. As time truncated life test helps the quality inspector to ensure products' quality where the lifetime is a specified quality characteristic, several authors have designed different sampling plans such as SSP, DSP, modified DSP, special purpose sampling plans, etc., for lot sentencing based on the results obtained through time truncated life test (see for example, Lio et al (2010), Rao et al (2012), Al-Omari (2014), Al-Omari et al (2016, Aslam et al (2013Aslam et al ( , 2016, Aslam et al (2017), Balamurali et al (2017a, b), Al-Omari et al (2018, Kannan et al (2022), Shrahili et al (2021), Alomani and Al-Omari (2022)). Such sampling plans have been designed to ensure the mean and median life of the products under various statistical distributions (see Table 1).…”
Section: Ijqrm 415mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some computational difficulties in DSP since it is considered that the cumulative number of defective (or failure) items for lot acceptance determination. Hence, to avoid this complication in computation while considering minimum sample size rather than SSP, Aslam et al (2016) proposed the modification of DSP and named as an improved DSP. It is to be pointed out that the operating procedure of modified DSP slightly differs from the same of DSP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gamma distribution is widely discussed when modeling lifetime distributions in reliability and survival analysis (see, for example, Refs. [10,11]), insurance (see [12,13]), and hydrology (see [14]). As with many other distributions, the Gamma distribution is long-tailed and positively skewed with an infinite terminus on the right.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing double sampling, a second sample is selected, and if a decision is not reached based on the first sample, the decision is made based on the combined sample information. However, in the proposed MDS plan, if a decision is not reached based on the first sample, the final decision is made based on the second sample information while using the first sample information to determine the probability of it being in control; see Aslam et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%