“…A number of alternative approaches have been developed and implemented in computer codes to treat point defects in ionic solids, with ICECAP 7, GUESS 8, and AIMP 9 being of particular relevance to us, but also of note are the closely related yet differing methods reported in the literature 10–29. In the context of embedding, rather than hybrid quantum mechanical (QM) molecular mechanical (MM) approaches in general, the important distinctions between these methods primarily concern: - The boundary conditions on the cluster (compare the perturbed cluster approach by Pisani et al 13 with the embedded and cyclic cluster approaches by Bredow et al 15) and the localization procedure (compare the derivation procedures of Barandiaran and Seijo 9, who employ the strong orthogonality approximation with the recent, more general approach by Shidlovskaya 14).
- The cluster termination, employed in the field of semicovalent materials (compare the popular hydrogen termination with the semiempirical link atom approaches developed independently by Antes et al 27, Sushko et al 8, and Nasluzov et al 23.
…”