Crop Breeding 2016
DOI: 10.1201/9781315365084-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Evidence-Based Genome-Scale Metabolic Models for Maize Leaf, Embryo, and Endosperm

Abstract: There is a growing demand for genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for plants, fueled by the need to understand the metabolic basis of crop yield and by progress in genome and transcriptome sequencing. Methods are also required to enable the interpretation of plant transcriptome data to study how cellular metabolic activity varies under different growth conditions or even within different organs, tissues, and developmental stages. Such methods depend extensively on the accuracy with which genes have been map… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also called each gene “active” or “inactive” based on its expression level (see the next section). Finally, we ran transcriptomic FBA (Seaver et al, ) to fit the flux predictions made by our models to gene activity computed from our RNA‐seq data. This approach attempts to force reactions associated with inactive genes off, while forcing reactions associated with active genes on, without preventing the model from producing biomass.…”
Section: Protocols Of Network Reconstruction From Single Genomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also called each gene “active” or “inactive” based on its expression level (see the next section). Finally, we ran transcriptomic FBA (Seaver et al, ) to fit the flux predictions made by our models to gene activity computed from our RNA‐seq data. This approach attempts to force reactions associated with inactive genes off, while forcing reactions associated with active genes on, without preventing the model from producing biomass.…”
Section: Protocols Of Network Reconstruction From Single Genomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…three isoprenoid compounds) in different tissues was validated by metabolomics technologies, but no assessment of the correspondence between flux distributions and protein abundance was carried out. Finally, Seaver et al (2015) extracted an organ-specific model for the maize leaf and tissue-specific models for embryo and endosperm cells by including (similarly to iMAT) a minimal set of reactions required to fill gaps in the network while maximizing the number of flux-carrying reactions associated with highly expressed genes. The models are accompanied by biomass reactions based on measurements under the same conditions, and their validity was tested by comparing the predicted fluxes with those coming from MFA.…”
Section: Context-specific Models In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we used limited data selected primarily from AraCyc to determine the subcellular localization of proteins in our primary reference genome, Arabidopsis. In this release, we switch to using an array of evidence sources, building upon our recently published work (Seaver et al ., ). Our evidence sources for subcellular localization include PPDB (Sun et al ., ), SUBA3 (Tanz et al ., ) and AraCyc (Zhang et al ., ; Schlapfer et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Plants in this nitrogen treatment study were watered with nutrient solution containing either 10 m m KNO 3 (nitrate treatment), 10 m m (NH 4 ) 3 PO 4 (ammonia treatment) or 10 m m urea and root tissue was harvested after 30 days. We used these datasets in combination with the metabolic reconstructions generated by PlantSEED to compute an expression percentile for each reaction under each condition (Seaver et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%