2002
DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Filler-Matrix Coupling in Resin Composites

Abstract: Ineffective silane coupling between filler and matrix within dental composites is prone to accelerated in vivo degradation. In this study, we examined to what degree a procedure involving chemical decontamination of filler prior to silanization could improve the filler-matrix bonding, and thus the physico-mechanical properties, of composites. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed that filler-matrix coupling largely depended upon siloxane bridge (Si-O-Si) formation between the silica surface and the silane … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This protocol has been effectively used to stress the filler-matrix interfaces in resin composites (Yoshida et al 2002). Thermal cycling was chosen since it is a nondestructive aging method.…”
Section: Preparation and Characterization Of Hybrid Resin Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This protocol has been effectively used to stress the filler-matrix interfaces in resin composites (Yoshida et al 2002). Thermal cycling was chosen since it is a nondestructive aging method.…”
Section: Preparation and Characterization Of Hybrid Resin Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naveen et al 24) found that PMMA reinforced with silanized glass fibers exhibit markedly enhanced flexural strength. Although an improved silane bond was fabricated by hydrosilylation after silanation 30) or application of an acetone primer to the glass prior to silane treatment, such procedures do not solve the problem of slow silane degradation in oral fluids 31,32) .…”
Section: Silane Coupling Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KHN represents the resistance to local deformation due to loading, which is heavily affected by filler load, size, and shape of the resin composite [24][25][26] . UTS, on the other hand, is the maximum resistance to tensile force, which is mainly affected by the structure of the resin matrix and filler-matrix adhesion [27][28][29][30] . In other words, UTS would be more strongly influenced by the polymerization rate of the resin matrix as compared to KHN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%