Remediation of contaminated groundwater is an expensive and lengthy process. (ii) used Fe 0 amounts must represent 30 to 60 vol-% of the mixture, and (iii) Fe 0 beds are deep-bed filtration systems. The major output of this study is that thicker barriers are needed for long service life. Fe 0 filters for save drinking water production should use several filters in series to achieve the treatment goal. In all cases proper material selection is an essential issue. [5][6][7][8], and (ii) as reagents to assist biofiltration in household filters [3,9,10]. The fundamental process responsible for contaminant removal in both contexts is necessarily the oxidative dissolution of Fe 0 (iron corrosion) which may be coupled with contaminant reduction (reactive walls) or the subsequent precipitation of iron hydroxides which may be coupled with contaminant adsorption and co-precipitation (household filters).Adsorption, co-precipitation and chemical transformations (oxidation and/or reduction) are not mutually exclusive [11][12][13]. It is obvious that in household filters and reactive walls, a synergy between these three processes is responsible for expected and observed decontamination. Moreover, these processes proceed in the inter-granular porosity of the packed beds which are made up of Fe 0 (100 %) or a mixture of Fe 0 and an inert material (e.g. gravel, pumice, sand) [2,14]. Because of the volumetric expansive nature of the process of iron corrosion [15], the porosity of the filtrating systems certainly decreases with increasing service life, possibly yielding complete permeability loss system (filter clogging) [16,17]. The filling of the pore volume by corrosion products is necessarily coupled with improved size exclusion capacity. Therefore, a fourth mechanism for decontamination in packed Fe 0 beds is The concept that contaminants are fundamentally removed by adsorption and co-precipitation is consistent with many experimental observations which remained non-elucidated by the reductive transformation concept [11,12]. Although researchers are continuing to maintain the validity of the latter concept [24][25][26], the new concept was validated [27,28] and has been independently verified [29,30]. As a matter of course the concept of adsorption/co-
Metallic iron for household filtersWhile using slow sand filtration for water treatment in rural Bangladesh, it was observed that the filter efficiency for arsenic removal depends on the iron content of natural waters. Arsenic was readily removed from Fe-rich natural waters. Accordingly, Fe 0 is used "to provide a constant input of iron (soluble or surface precipitate) for groundwater low in soluble iron"[32]. The very efficient resulting filter for As removal was the 3-Kolsi filter [10,33]. A typical 3-Kolsi filter contained a layer of about 3 kg Fe 0 (100 % Fe 0 ). However, the 3-Kolsi filter was not sustainable as it clogged after some 8 weeks of operation [3,34].The remarkable efficiency of 3-Kolsi filters has prompted researchers to further develop the system fo...