1992
DOI: 10.1109/22.121730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved finite-difference formulation in frequency domain for three-dimensional scattering problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting equations are cumbersome; however, presenting each expression using matrices provides a compact form. Thus, extending the lossless and isotropic methods of Beilenhoff et al [19] to our case of lossy and anisotropic media, and using notation defined in the Appendix, (1) and (2) become…”
Section: Fig 2 the Field Quantities Associated With The Mth Cell (Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting equations are cumbersome; however, presenting each expression using matrices provides a compact form. Thus, extending the lossless and isotropic methods of Beilenhoff et al [19] to our case of lossy and anisotropic media, and using notation defined in the Appendix, (1) and (2) become…”
Section: Fig 2 the Field Quantities Associated With The Mth Cell (Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FDFD formulation presented here is an extension to lossy media of a method developed for lossless media in [19]. The mesh-truncation approach involves using an anisotropic absorbing PML following the ideas in [7,24].…”
Section: Fdfd Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the practical frequency range (< 1 MHz), it is adequate to ignore displacement currents in the formulation as is typically done by other researchers, but it is not essential to do so in the particular implementation that we have chosen. We have used the finite-difference frequency-domain formulation of Beilenhoff et al (1992) and the anisotropic PML (perfectly matched layer) approach (Berenger, 1994) to boundary conditions of Wu et al (1997) to deal with the fact that the computations must be done in a finite domain even though the real problem is effectively of infinite domain. The resulting formulas for the forward solver reduce to a problem of the form (1) Ax=y, where A is a non-Hermitian matrix with real values off the diagonal and complex values along its diagonal (Smith, 1996a,b).…”
Section: Progress In Code Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the practical frequency range (C 1 MHz), it is adequate to ignore displacement currents in the formulation as is typically done by other researchers, but it is not essential to do so in the particular implementation that we have chosen. We have used the finite-difference frequency-domain formulation of Beilenhoff et al (1992) and the anisotropic PML (perfectly matched layer) approach (Berenger, 1994) to boundary conditions of Wu et al (1997) to deal with the fact that the computations must be done in a finite domain even though the real problem is effectively of infinite domain, The resulting formulas for the forward solver reduce to a problem of the form fix =.Y, where A is a non-Hermitian matrix with real values off the diagonal and complex values along its diagonal (Smith, 1996a,b). The matrix A may be either symmetric or nonsymmetric depending on details of the boundary conditions chosen (i.e., the particular PML used in the applcation).…”
Section: Forward Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%