2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2922426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Firefly Algorithm for the Optimal Coordination of Directional Overcurrent Relays

Abstract: In an electrical power network linear and non-linear models are used for directional overcurrent relay (DOCR) coordination issue by applying different heuristic techniques. Nature inspired algorithms (NIA) have found great interest in power system optimization issues. This paper proposes the recently developed meta-heuristic technique known as Firefly Algorithm (FA) that mimics the flashing behavior of fireflies. The implementation of the proposed algorithm has been utilized to solve the coordination of DOCR p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the performance of proposed IMFO is evaluated using three different networks (8-bus, 9-bus, and 15-bus). In each test network, the proposed IMFO is compared with other well-known optimization algorithms (EFO [19], DE [23], MEFO [19], PSO [23], MWCA [1], WCA [1], HS [12], SQA [24], GSA [24], GA-NLP [25], GSA-SQP [24], BBO-LP, GA [23], CSA [26], SFSA [17], SA [5], BSA [27], EBSA [28], GSO [29], ER-WCA [30], WOA [31], HWO [31], FA [32], IFA [32], DJAYA [34], and OJAYA [34]) to show its superiority in finding the optimal solution for the coordination problem of DOCRs. Both of MFO and IMFO are applied on the following two cases: -Case #1, the coordination problem of DOCRs with the standard DOCR characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the performance of proposed IMFO is evaluated using three different networks (8-bus, 9-bus, and 15-bus). In each test network, the proposed IMFO is compared with other well-known optimization algorithms (EFO [19], DE [23], MEFO [19], PSO [23], MWCA [1], WCA [1], HS [12], SQA [24], GSA [24], GA-NLP [25], GSA-SQP [24], BBO-LP, GA [23], CSA [26], SFSA [17], SA [5], BSA [27], EBSA [28], GSO [29], ER-WCA [30], WOA [31], HWO [31], FA [32], IFA [32], DJAYA [34], and OJAYA [34]) to show its superiority in finding the optimal solution for the coordination problem of DOCRs. Both of MFO and IMFO are applied on the following two cases: -Case #1, the coordination problem of DOCRs with the standard DOCR characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different version of the differential algorithm was reported in [33] to solve the DOCR coordination problem to point out the superiority of modified differential evolution algorithms. Many other Nature-inspired algorithms like the grey wolf optimizer (GWO), teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO), biography-based optimization (BBO), back-tracking algorithm, the improved firefly (IFA) metaheuristic and modified electromagnetic field optimization (MEFO) were used for DOCR coordination in [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. A modified teaching-based optimization algorithm was implemented in [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified adaptive teaching learning based optimization algorithm is developed in [11]. Genetic algorithm [12,17], particle swarm optimization [18], seeker optimization algorithm [19], firefly algorithm [20] and differential evolution [21], methods have been proposed to coordinate relay paramerters. As it is well known, the metaheuristic methods are iteration-based and take long time to converge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%