2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved fracture resistance of 3D-printed elastoplastic structures with respect to their topology and orientation of deposited layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing technology creates parts layer by layer. A consequence of layering is the presence of pores and heterogeneities that cause anisotropic behaviour and preferential crack orientation 25 . The resistance of parts to mechanical damage is dependent on the orientation of the deposited layers 26 28 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing technology creates parts layer by layer. A consequence of layering is the presence of pores and heterogeneities that cause anisotropic behaviour and preferential crack orientation 25 . The resistance of parts to mechanical damage is dependent on the orientation of the deposited layers 26 28 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the above-mentioned works only considered static, quasi-brittle structures. In [165], Li et al developed a ductile fracture behavior combined within a BESO TO formulation. Another novelty of this work was the introduction of the anisotropy in the fracture behavior, to account for orientation in 3D printed fabrication process (see Figs.…”
Section: Single Materials Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topologies and fields are depicted for 3D printing orientations θ: (a) θ = 0 • ; (b) θ = 90 • ; θ = 120•. Reproduced from[165] with permission.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%