2021
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2020.3040708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Frequency-Domain Steady-State Modeling of the Dual-Active-Bridge Converter Considering Finite ZVS Transition Time Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure to obtain the LSM and SSM is simpler than the conventional DTM. The conventional DTM presented in (16) comprises an exponential matrix, results in a complicated model. The complex model obtained from DTM fails to give insightful information about the converter's behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The procedure to obtain the LSM and SSM is simpler than the conventional DTM. The conventional DTM presented in (16) comprises an exponential matrix, results in a complicated model. The complex model obtained from DTM fails to give insightful information about the converter's behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of methodology where one of the state variables' dynamics is ignored is known as reduced-order modeling. The reduced-order-model of the PS-BDAB can be classified as a continuous-time reduced-order model (CTROM) [6] - [11], Fourier series reduced-ordermodel (FSROM) [1], [12] and frequency domain reducedorder model (FDROM) [13] - [16]. Other methods use both state variables (full-order) to model and study the large and small-signal behavior of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations