2016
DOI: 10.17535/crorr.2016.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Full-Newton-Step Infeasible Interior-Point Method for Linear Complementarity Problems

Abstract: Abstract. We present an Infeasible Interior-Point Method for monotone Linear Complementarity Problem (LCP ) which is an improved version of the algorithm given in [13]. In the earlier version, each iteration consisted of one feasibility step and few centering steps. The improved version guarantees that after one feasibility step, the new iterate is feasible and close enough to the central path thanks to the much tighter proximity estimate which is based on the new lemma introduced in [18]. Thus, the centering … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pseudo-code of the new version of the algorithm is outlined in Figure 3 and the pseudo-code of the old version is outlined in [13]. Both versions are implemented in MATLAB and run on the desktop computer with Intel(R) core(TM) processor and 4 Gb of RAM running Windows 7 operating system.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pseudo-code of the new version of the algorithm is outlined in Figure 3 and the pseudo-code of the old version is outlined in [13]. Both versions are implemented in MATLAB and run on the desktop computer with Intel(R) core(TM) processor and 4 Gb of RAM running Windows 7 operating system.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is outlined in Figure 3 and throughout the text we referred to it as simply the Algorithm. The old version of the algorithm was discussed in [13,5]. In the old version of the method, each iteration consisted of one feasibility step and few centering steps (at most two) per iteration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are effective for solving large and ill-conditioned LCPs; their main drawbacks are the high cost per iteration and that they may not yield a good estimate of the solution when terminated early Morales et al (2007). Several algorithms have been proposed to lessen the required computations per step Lešaja et al (2012), Zangiabadi and Mansouri (2012). Yet, interior point algorithms remain computationally more expensive than active set algorithms Ferreau et al (2014).…”
Section: { }mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The less module provides an overview of the development of the linear programming problem, linear programming model, theory of linear programming, counting vertices -enumeration method, geometric method, 2_ D, simplex method, Charnes' M-method [15], the two-phase simplex method [15], and finally, the method of interior points [9,10]. Software that aided learning linear programming included Excel Solver, Lindo, Winqsb and Simplex apple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%