IECON'03. 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37468)
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2003.1280021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved genetic algorithm for economic load dispatch with valve-point loadings

Abstract: Abstract-Economic load dispatch is one of the optimization problems in power systems. This paper presents an improved genetic algorithm for economic load dispatch with valve-point loadings. New crossover and mutation operations are introduced. The solutions of the economic load dispatch with valve-point loadings under three cases are solved by the improved genetic algorithm. Test results are,given and compared with those from different published genetic algorithms. It will be shown that the proposed improved g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the classical PSO stuck at local solution after certain iteration. The results obtained by the IPSO method has been compared with the published results: GA [22], IGA [23], PSO [21], SAPSO [21], CPSO [21] and NPSO [21] given in Table 5. It is clearly shows that the proposed IPSO has less generation cost compared to other methods.…”
Section: B Case Study 2: 13 Unit Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the classical PSO stuck at local solution after certain iteration. The results obtained by the IPSO method has been compared with the published results: GA [22], IGA [23], PSO [21], SAPSO [21], CPSO [21] and NPSO [21] given in Table 5. It is clearly shows that the proposed IPSO has less generation cost compared to other methods.…”
Section: B Case Study 2: 13 Unit Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As usual, the region defined by the constraint set (4) is called the feasible region. Note that the transmission loss is omitted in (4) since the loss is typically less than 3% in practice and was often neglected in reported numerical experiments with a GA ( [1,3]). The profile of (3) cannot be geographically viewed as it involves three unknowns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the comparison to GA is not the issue of this Letter. One of the main reasons is that their stop-criteria are fundamentally different ( [1,3,4]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to verify the performance advantages of QEMA further, the simulation results were compared with that of other optimized algorithm, and the comparison results in Table 3. Algorithm 1 is QEMA which have been applied in this paper; Algorithm 2~Algorithm 5 is evolutionary programming algorithm which have been proposed in [18]; Algorithm 6 is improved genetic algorithm which have been proposed in [19]. Algorithm 7 is EMA.…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%