2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017jc013137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Global Net Surface Heat Flux

Abstract: Surface heat flux estimates from widely used atmospheric reanalyses differ locally by 10–30 W m−2 even in time mean. Here a method is presented to help identify the errors causing these differences and to reduce these errors by exploiting hydrographic observations and the resulting temperature increments produced by an ocean reanalysis. The method is applied to improve the climatological monthly net surface heat fluxes from three atmospheric reanalyses: MERRA‐2, ERA‐Interim, and JRA‐55, during an 8 year test p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study to determine the influence of freshwater and salinity into the SEAS region, multiple salinity products are used. The Simple Ocean Data Assimilation v3.12.2 (SODA) monthly ocean reanalysis product available on a 0.5° horizontal grid with 50 vertical layers is used from 1980 to 2016 (Carton et al, ; Carton et al, ). SODA v3.12.2 has observational data assimilation and is forced with JRA‐55DO with the Coupled Ocean‐Atmosphere Response Experiment version 4 bulk formulae for surface forcing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study to determine the influence of freshwater and salinity into the SEAS region, multiple salinity products are used. The Simple Ocean Data Assimilation v3.12.2 (SODA) monthly ocean reanalysis product available on a 0.5° horizontal grid with 50 vertical layers is used from 1980 to 2016 (Carton et al, ; Carton et al, ). SODA v3.12.2 has observational data assimilation and is forced with JRA‐55DO with the Coupled Ocean‐Atmosphere Response Experiment version 4 bulk formulae for surface forcing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the two Argo profile analyses resolve low SSS in the Amazon plume, it appears that its interannual variability is not resolved well. For a better representation of high variable Amazon plume SSS, a Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA version 3; Carton et al, 2018) is used. Particular run used in this study (SODA 3.4.2) is driven by the Era-Interim surface forcing and monthly river discharge (Dai et al, 2009(Dai et al, ) and spans 1980(Dai et al, -2015 Observed monthly discharge at Obidos station is used as a simple proxy for Amazon discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…q q q q q q q q q q q q qq qq q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q sion 3 (SODA3) reanalysis (Carton et al, 2018), which uses all temperature and salinity profiles from the World Ocean Database. This data is available for depths between 5 and 5000 meters below the surface at a spatial resolution of 0.5 degrees latitude and longitude.…”
Section: Real Data Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , 461, whereŜ P j,i is the prediction at location i in simulation j using the preferential model andŜ NP j,i the equivalent using the non-preferential q q qq q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q qq q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q qq q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q (Carton et al, 2018). Panel (b): Median of prediction difference between preferential and non-preferential models.…”
Section: Real Data Examplementioning
confidence: 99%