2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory 2006
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2006.261691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Hermite multivariate polynomial interpolation

Abstract: In this paper we give an algorithm with complexity O`µ 2´t o solve Hermite multivariate polynomial interpolation with µ conditions on its Hasse derivatives. In the case of bivariate interpolation used to perform list-decoding on Reed-Solomon of length n and dimension k with multiplicity m on each point, it permits to obtain a complexity in O`n 2 m 4´w hich does not depend on the rate k/n and better than previously known complexity in O " n 2 m 5 (n/k). This algorithm can also be used for recent interpolation l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach based on the computation of a reduced lattice basis was in particular the basis of the extensions to the multivariate case s > 1 in [10,9,14]. In the multivariate case as well, the result in Theorem 1 improves on the best previously known bounds [10,9,14]; we detail those bounds and we prove this claim in Appendix C. In [18], the authors solve a problem similar to Problem 1 except that they do not assume that the x i are distinct. For simple roots and under some genericity assumption on the points {(x i , y i,1 , .…”
Section: Problem 2 Simultaneouspolynomialapproximationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This approach based on the computation of a reduced lattice basis was in particular the basis of the extensions to the multivariate case s > 1 in [10,9,14]. In the multivariate case as well, the result in Theorem 1 improves on the best previously known bounds [10,9,14]; we detail those bounds and we prove this claim in Appendix C. In [18], the authors solve a problem similar to Problem 1 except that they do not assume that the x i are distinct. For simple roots and under some genericity assumption on the points {(x i , y i,1 , .…”
Section: Problem 2 Simultaneouspolynomialapproximationsmentioning
confidence: 79%