2006
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2006.877147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Heuristics for the Minimum Label Spanning Tree Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
39
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since a higher frequency label may not always be the best place to start, it may not perform as well as the Pilot Method. Another modified version by Xiong et al (2006) is similar to the previous one, except that it tries the most promising 30% of the labels at the initial step. Then it runs MVCA to determine the remaining labels.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, since a higher frequency label may not always be the best place to start, it may not perform as well as the Pilot Method. Another modified version by Xiong et al (2006) is similar to the previous one, except that it tries the most promising 30% of the labels at the initial step. Then it runs MVCA to determine the remaining labels.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, they randomly select one of these candidates, and add it to the incomplete solution. In addition, Xiong et al (2006) presented a Modified Genetic Algorithm (MGA) that was shown to have the best performance for the MLST problem in terms of solution quality and running time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations