2002
DOI: 10.1021/ac020200o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved tert-Butyldimethylsilylation Gas Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometric Detection of Nerve Gas Hydrolysis Products from Soils by Pretreatment of Aqueous Alkaline Extraction and Strong Anion-Exchange Solid-Phase Extraction

Abstract: In the analysis of tert-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives (IBDMS) of alkyl methylphosphonic acids (RMPA) and methylphosphonic acid (MPA), from soils by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), the detection yields are generally low, due to the suppression of TBDMS derivatization by the soil matrix components and the adsorption of RMPA and MPA to the soils. An ion-exchange pretreatment of the aqueous soil extract can be used to overcome the former factor by removing interfering compounds. A pretreatment metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantification of phases I and II metabolites of chemical warfare agents by gas chromatography or liquid chromatography, coupled with mass spectrometric detection, is the historic and most common approach for this assessment [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], although other detectors have been employed [10]. Researchers are also investigating the detection of chemical warfare agents and their degradation products in environmental samples [11][12][13][14][15]. Some researchers also employ various detector strategies in the absence of a chromatographic separation [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of phases I and II metabolites of chemical warfare agents by gas chromatography or liquid chromatography, coupled with mass spectrometric detection, is the historic and most common approach for this assessment [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], although other detectors have been employed [10]. Researchers are also investigating the detection of chemical warfare agents and their degradation products in environmental samples [11][12][13][14][15]. Some researchers also employ various detector strategies in the absence of a chromatographic separation [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry can be used to determine VX degradation products (Love 2004) and sulfur mustard degradation products (Creasy 1999). Various chemical reactions to form volatile derivatives of agent degradation products followed by analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry or gas chromatography/flame photometric detection is another strategy that can be successfully used to detect agent degradation products (Creasy 1999, Purdon 1989, Naomi 2002, Black 2003 Table 5. AEGL 8-24 hr -Acute Exposure Guidelines; these values have been extrapolated for 24 hour exposure from AEGL-1 8 hr values for the purpose of this report; d.l.…”
Section: C5 Lab-based Analysis Methods For Late-stage Decontaminatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We attempted to break the binding of phosphonates onto the soil under elevated pH conditions by 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH). 42) The soil alkaline extract was neutralized with The recovery values were obtained after aqueous extraction and directly subjected to CE analysis and represent averages (n = 3). hydrofluoric acid, subjected to SPE, and analyzed by TBDMS GC-MS. Figure 7 indicates the yields of RMPAs and MPA by TBDMS GC-MS detection from soil samples combined with neutral (water) or alkali aqueous soil extraction and SPE pretreatment.…”
Section: Detection Of Nerve Gas Hydrolysis Products From Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%