2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved identification of unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries in a clinical population using the acromial center line to dorsal clavicle radiographic measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is complex and time-consuming to perform and fails to show adequate discriminant validity to distinguish between Rockwood injury types IIIA and IIIB. 10,31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is complex and time-consuming to perform and fails to show adequate discriminant validity to distinguish between Rockwood injury types IIIA and IIIB. 10,31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is complex and timeconsuming to perform and fails to show adequate discriminant validity to distinguish between Rockwood injury types IIIA and IIIB. 10,31 The circles measurement was developed to address these limitations. The measurement is independent of displacement plane, judging total ACJ displacement in any direction rather than trying to quantify vertical and/or horizontal displacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The well-documented C-C distance showed near perfect reduction of the joint in a vertical plane, compared to the contralateral side, which was maintained up to 2 years following surgery. The AC-DC measurement of vertical ACJ displacement, which has been shown to have greater reliability and resilience to radiographic projectional error than C-C distance [ 19 , 25 ], also demonstrated statistically and clinically significant restoration of ACJ position at 2 years. Loss of vertical reduction, with increasing C-C distance has been seen to occur with the majority of other stabilisation techniques [ 10 , 11 , 24 ], showing the BiPOD technique in a favourable light against the existing techniques for restoration of vertical stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since clinical data has shown a vast number of persistent horizontal instability following modern arthroscopic AC joint reconstruction techniques [23,24], not only the surgical management but also the clinical assessment have been reconsidered. It has been claimed that parameters assessable on AP and Zanca view do not allow for quantification of horizontal instability, therefore, the use of new radiographic parameters in a single lateral Alexander view has been recently recommended [15,29]. Anyhow, the ESA panel agreed that a true AP view or a bilateral Zanca view without loading the arm are still adequate for a correct diagnosis, with no need of modified Alexander view to seek for horizontal instability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%