2011
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2010.2102775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Instantaneous Average Current-Sharing Control Scheme for Parallel-Connected Inverter Considering Line Impedance Impact in Microgrid Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the master-slave control, the master converter works as a VSI by producing controlled voltage, while slave inverters act as CSIs by obeying the current pattern ordered from the master inverter [74,75]. The average load sharing control continuously updates the current reference for each inverter as a weighted average current [76,77]. To achieve proper power sharing and smooth mode transfer, peak-value based current sharing control is applied, where the reference current magnitude of a VSI is determined by the current magnitude of the VSI through peak value calculation [78,79].…”
Section: Communication-based Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the master-slave control, the master converter works as a VSI by producing controlled voltage, while slave inverters act as CSIs by obeying the current pattern ordered from the master inverter [74,75]. The average load sharing control continuously updates the current reference for each inverter as a weighted average current [76,77]. To achieve proper power sharing and smooth mode transfer, peak-value based current sharing control is applied, where the reference current magnitude of a VSI is determined by the current magnitude of the VSI through peak value calculation [78,79].…”
Section: Communication-based Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], rather than regulating DC voltage and applying consensus-based approach on current sharing, the droop coefficient of each converter is adjusted to further enhance the current sharing among multiple converters. In [11], a generalized system-level model comprised of multiple parallel converters is derived to analyze the power sharing issues considering line impedance. Meanwhile, adaptive gain scheduling technology is employed to compensate the mismatching line impedance.…”
Section: Review Of Active Current Sharing Strategies In DC Microgridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, it can be seen that the drive circuitry for switches S 1 and S 2 does not demand isolation because their source terminals are both connected to the same reference node, what is an advantage over the interleaved topology. Besides, current sharing is of great concern in interleaving converters [22], [23], what is assured in the 3SSC buck converter due to the autotransformer without the use of special control schemes.…”
Section: F Theoretical Comparison With Other Buck-based Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%