2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-682x(02)00029-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved integro-modal approach with pressure distribution assessment and the use of overlapped cavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spurious modes are not observed in this method. The pressure mode shapes are shown for modes [1,0] and [2,1] in Fig. 6 and are in a good agreement with the FE mode shapes except at the subcavity flexible virtual membranes due to the boundary condition, i.e.…”
Section: Regular Subcavitysupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spurious modes are not observed in this method. The pressure mode shapes are shown for modes [1,0] and [2,1] in Fig. 6 and are in a good agreement with the FE mode shapes except at the subcavity flexible virtual membranes due to the boundary condition, i.e.…”
Section: Regular Subcavitysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The proposed IMCM method has less error as compared to the IMM method, for the same number of subcavities and the number of acoustic and structural modes. Figure 4 shows the pressure mode shapes of mode [1,2] and mode [2,1], respectively, for illustration. The other mode shapes are also in good agreement, however, they are not shown here for brevity.…”
Section: Regular Subcavitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency response of the sound pressure at (1.9 m, 0.1 m) was compared with analytical solutions based on modal superposition using 2500 modes [Anyunzoghe and Cheng, 2002] in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cavities of more complex shapes, various so-called semi-analytical methods were developed [Succi, 1987;Dowell et al, 1977;Missaoui and Cheng, 1997], by pushing the analytical treatment to its limit before deploying numerical descretizations. Most of these methods, however, involve stringent limitation on the cavity shapes such as a slight distortion from a regular one [Succi, 1987], a combination of regular-shaped sub-cavities with known eigen-functions [Dowell et al, 1977] or a combination of the aforementioned scenarios [Missaoui and Cheng, 1997;Anyunzoghe and Cheng, 2002]. As a last resort, numerical solvers such as finite element methods (FEM) and boundary element method (BEM) have long been recognized as the most versatile tools to deal with systems of various shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques were also developed in an attempt to increase the calculation accuracy such as the use of extended mode shape functions for a single cavity or the coupling between two overlapped adjacent sub-cavities. 10 Meanwhile, the skepticism on the modal-based method has always been persistent as evidenced by some recent papers. For example, the deficiencies of the method based on rigid-walled modes were reiterated by Ginsberg 11 , who employed an extension of Ritz series method to the problem, and the modified formulation is found to be accurate above the fundamental rigid-cavity resonance frequency for light fluid loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%