1980
DOI: 10.13182/nse80-a21307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Interpolation Schemes in Anisotropic Source Flux Iteration Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quadratic representation of the source distribution has also been developed for onedimensional Cartesian problems. 31 In this Quadratic method (QM), the spatial variation of the source term Q is approximated by a second order polynomial. For a given computational cell, the cell average flux in the cell and in the two adjacent cells are used to determine the coefficients of the polynomial.…”
Section: Characteristics Methods In Reactor Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quadratic representation of the source distribution has also been developed for onedimensional Cartesian problems. 31 In this Quadratic method (QM), the spatial variation of the source term Q is approximated by a second order polynomial. For a given computational cell, the cell average flux in the cell and in the two adjacent cells are used to determine the coefficients of the polynomial.…”
Section: Characteristics Methods In Reactor Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarks. As discussed in [6,4], Lemmas 3 and 4 together will prove the superconvergence of the cell-average fluxes, i.e., that (2.18)…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The specific difference methods considered by Larsen and Nelson are the step characteristic, diamond difference, linear discontinuous, linear characteristic, linear moments, and quadratic methods described in [1], [5]. One of the salient results in the work by Larsen and Nelson is that the discretization errors for the cell-edge and cell-average flux approximates to the linear characteristic and quadratic methods of Gopinath et al., and of Vaidyanathan [4], [9], [10], are of order four, whereas the discretization errors for the corresponding approximates to the widely used linear discontinuous method are of order three. These theoretical results had been confirmed numerically by Larsen and Miller in [5], who found that the asymptotic convergence rates for the cell-edge and cell-average fluxes to the linear characteristic and quadratic methods can be observed on coarser meshes than for the lesser rate of order three fgr the corresponding fluxes of the linear discontinuous method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. 1,2,[5][6][7][8]17,18) in analyzing the consistency and order of spatial finite-difference methods as employed in transport calculations. In effect our aim here is to show that such results in fact carry over to problems with scattering (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%