2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72751-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Leader Election for Self-organizing Programmable Matter

Abstract: Abstract. We consider programmable matter that consists of computationally limited devices (called particles) that are able to self-organize in order to achieve some collective goal without the need for central control or external intervention. We use the geometric amoebot model to describe such self-organizing particle systems, which defines how particles can actively move and communicate with one another. In this paper, we present an efficient local-control algorithm which solves the leader election problem … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As our main contribution in this paper, we investigate the runtime of our algorithm and prove that our algorithm terminates within a linear number of rounds with high probability. This result relies, in part, on an update to the leader election protocol used in [3] which is fully defined and analyzed in [20]. We also present a matching linear lower bound for any local-control coating algorithm (i.e., one which uses only local information in its execution) that holds with high probability.…”
Section: Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our main contribution in this paper, we investigate the runtime of our algorithm and prove that our algorithm terminates within a linear number of rounds with high probability. This result relies, in part, on an update to the leader election protocol used in [3] which is fully defined and analyzed in [20]. We also present a matching linear lower bound for any local-control coating algorithm (i.e., one which uses only local information in its execution) that holds with high probability.…”
Section: Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to formally prove with high probability results on the runtime of the universal coating algorithm, we introduced a variant of our leader election protocol under the amoebot model which provably elects a leader in O(n) asynchronous rounds, w.h.p. 7 [20]. This gives the following runtime bound.…”
Section: First Layer: Complaint-based Coating and Leader Electionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this appendix we present a way to reduce the required number of rounds in order that this algorithm finishes its execution (by using the S-contraction algorithm). In the remaining part of this appendix, the leader election algorithm from [5] will be called the general leader election Algorithm 4 A spanning-tree algorithm for a particle p.…”
Section: H Combining the S-contraction Algorithm With A General Leadementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way how the messages are re-transmitted in the algorithm of Daymude et al[5] (square: articulation; dashed arrow: message transmitted along the border; simple arrow: message transmitted along the hole).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%