2023
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10080919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network for Finger Vein Recognition System

Abstract: Computer vision (CV) technology and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) demonstrate superior feature extraction capabilities in the field of bioengineering. However, during the capturing process of finger-vein images, translation can cause a decline in the accuracy rate of the model, making it challenging to apply CNNs to real-time and highly accurate finger-vein recognition in various real-world environments. Moreover, despite CNNs’ high accuracy, CNNs require many parameters, and existing research has confi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed model, its performance was compared with other lightweight models focusing on the Correct Identity Rate (CIR) and model parameters. The comparative analysis included the following baseline models: ResNet-50 [47], which represents a deep model architecture; Inception V3 [2], exemplifying a wider model architecture; and other state-of-the-art mobile networks such as MobileNet [36,37], MobileViT [38], EfficientNet [48], and ILCNN [30]. All of the models underwent evaluation under uniform conditions to ensure a fair comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed model, its performance was compared with other lightweight models focusing on the Correct Identity Rate (CIR) and model parameters. The comparative analysis included the following baseline models: ResNet-50 [47], which represents a deep model architecture; Inception V3 [2], exemplifying a wider model architecture; and other state-of-the-art mobile networks such as MobileNet [36,37], MobileViT [38], EfficientNet [48], and ILCNN [30]. All of the models underwent evaluation under uniform conditions to ensure a fair comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao introduced a lightweight CNN that incorporates a center loss function and dynamic regularization to tackle image quality issues and expedite convergence, demonstrating decreased error rates and enhanced computational efficiency [29]. Furthermore, Hsia's [30] improved lightweight CNN (ILCNN) addresses translation-induced accuracy problems and enhances parameter efficiency using diverse branch blocks (DBB) [31], adaptive polyphase sampling (APS) [32], and a coordinate attention mechanism (CoAM) [33]. This model not only achieves high accuracy but does so with a minimal parameter count of just 1.23 million.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results demonstrate the potential of the LDA-FV model in practical applications, which offers a balance between efficiency, accuracy, and ease of deployment in real-world environments. Params (M) Semi-PFVN (28) 94.67 3.35 MMRAN (12) 96.07 3.51 LightFVN + ACE (29) 96.17 2.65 W. Liu et al (27) 98.58 5.85 LFVRN_CE + ACE (24) 99.09 4.93 EfficientNet-B0 (38) 99.70 4.64 ILCNN (39) 99.82 1.23 FV-RSA (40) 99.90 8.70 LDA-FV (This work) 99.90 1.20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods CIR (%) LED Laser DenseNet-121 (41) 93.06 93.19 EfficientNet-B0 (38) 95.82 92.22 ILCNN (39) 95.90 93.52 LDA-FV (This work) 97.50 97. 22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biometric characteristics can be divided into two categories: extrinsic characteristics and intrinsic characteristics. Biometric systems that use extrinsic characteristics usually rely on external features of the human body, such as fingerprints, faces, and irises [3]. Even though biometric systems that utilize extrinsic characteristics are less susceptible to theft than conventional methods, they are vulnerable in practice to forged input, raising privacy and security concerns [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%