2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved LSF method for loss estimation and its application in DG allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be emphasized that in some situations, the optimal values obtained in Equations 10 and 11 fall out of the limits as provided in the general limitations of DG defined in Equation 15. As a result, selecting optimal maximum limits in such situations becomes significant in minimizing active power loss.…”
Section: -Optimal Limits Of Dg Power Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be emphasized that in some situations, the optimal values obtained in Equations 10 and 11 fall out of the limits as provided in the general limitations of DG defined in Equation 15. As a result, selecting optimal maximum limits in such situations becomes significant in minimizing active power loss.…”
Section: -Optimal Limits Of Dg Power Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 4: Find the optimal profiles (P opt DGmi and Q opt DGmi ) and size of DG at each bus by using Equations 10 and 11, in case these optimal values are located out of the limits in Equation 15, use the maximum values {case 1 or case 2} as optimal values.…”
Section: Computational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this reference, electric power load variation has been presented in the form of a linear combination of some independent random factors and to determine energy losses for a certain time-period. Two formulas of the loss factor for calculating energy losses were improved, based on the Minimum Load Factor (MLF) and the load factor by Fu et al (2016). Due to the difficulties of estimating losses using maximum demands and the loss factor, Queiroz et al (2012) have proposed an alternative loss estimation approach that relies on the loss coefficient as the fundamental parameter for describing load variations in loss estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [6] proposed loss coefficient (LSC) and equivalent hours of losses (EHL) to replace the LSF and the equivalent hours (EH) for improving the accuracy of energy loss estimation and the applicability of loss patterns. Two formulas of the LSF for calculating energy losses were improved, based on the minimum load factor (MLF) and the load factor (LF) in [7]. Reference [8] proposed an estimation method of technical losses that was based on the reference feeder (RF) of the medium voltage distribution network characterized by LSF, load distribution (LD), feeder peak power demand (PPD), and its length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%