2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved mass accuracy for higher mass peptides by using SWIFT excitation for MALDI-FTICR mass spectrometry

Abstract: Stepwise-external calibration has previously been shown to produce sub part-per-million (ppm) mass accuracy for the MALDI-FTICR/MS analyses of peptides up to m/z 2500. The present work extends these results to ions up to m/z 4000. Mass measurement errors for ions of higher mass-to-charge are larger than for ions below m/z 2500 when using conventional chirp excitation to detect ions. Mass accuracy obtained by using stored waveform inverse Fourier transform (SWIFT) excitation was evaluated and compared with chir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the accuracy of generally 5 ppm for a 9.4 T instrument equipped with an infinity cell for a 279.6 ms transient, the mass accuracy for a 200 ms transient and a magnetic field of 4.7 T is considered reasonable. Mass accuracy is also influenced by many other factors including the geometry of the specific ICR cell used, space-charge effects, and the strength and homogeneity of the magnetic field and electric field. , For example, the average mass error could be further reduced to 23.8 ppm with an optimized ramped excitation waveform (i.e., the excitation power is lower for low m / z ions and higher for high m / z ions) in a 50 ms transient. As the back trapping plate had been replaced by a mesh, it was also reasonable to expect a slight distortion of the ion cloud position and shape due to the asymmetric trapping field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the accuracy of generally 5 ppm for a 9.4 T instrument equipped with an infinity cell for a 279.6 ms transient, the mass accuracy for a 200 ms transient and a magnetic field of 4.7 T is considered reasonable. Mass accuracy is also influenced by many other factors including the geometry of the specific ICR cell used, space-charge effects, and the strength and homogeneity of the magnetic field and electric field. , For example, the average mass error could be further reduced to 23.8 ppm with an optimized ramped excitation waveform (i.e., the excitation power is lower for low m / z ions and higher for high m / z ions) in a 50 ms transient. As the back trapping plate had been replaced by a mesh, it was also reasonable to expect a slight distortion of the ion cloud position and shape due to the asymmetric trapping field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-linear regression to obtain the constants for the calibration equations was performed using software developed in our laboratory. 19 (3)…”
Section: Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stepwise-external calibration mimics internal calibration, but the calibrants are the mass values obtained from a separately acquired spectrum using external calibration at low trapping potential. 18,19 The post-processing internal calibration was performed by using the theoretical masses of identified peptides as calibrant points. 6,30 To visualize the performance of N15Cal and compare N15Cal with other calibration methods, a plot of the mass measurement error distribution (shown in ppm) of the peptides identified by matching within 10 ppm is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Algorithm Performance For Proteome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations