1986
DOI: 10.1080/02681218680000461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved method for estimation of azole antifungal inhibitory concentrations againstCandidaspecies, based on azole/antibiotic interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since econazole appears to be bound strongly by serum proteins, it is unsuitable for systemic therapy. The in vitro antifungal activity of econazole is comparable to that of miconazole; broad-spectrum activity against dermatophytes, Candida species, other pathogenic yeasts, filamentous fungi, and some gram-positive bacteria (26,202,255,303).…”
Section: Econazolementioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since econazole appears to be bound strongly by serum proteins, it is unsuitable for systemic therapy. The in vitro antifungal activity of econazole is comparable to that of miconazole; broad-spectrum activity against dermatophytes, Candida species, other pathogenic yeasts, filamentous fungi, and some gram-positive bacteria (26,202,255,303).…”
Section: Econazolementioning
confidence: 80%
“…In an assay to test for the suppression of intracellular ATP synthesis, terconazole had no effect. Other tested triazoles also had no effect in this assay (202).…”
Section: Antifungal Imidazoles Under Developmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the 1970s and 1980s, synergy between TET and AMB was observed clinically and in animal models with wildtype strains of C. albicans, Aspergillus species and Cryptococcus species (Graybill & Mitchell, 1980;Kwan et al, 1972;Odds et al, 1986;Raab & Hogl, 1980;Rubin et al, 1983). However, no molecular mechanism was elucidated at the time for any of these species and it is important to revisit this phenomenon as the use of TETregulatable promoters in these species has become increasingly common and as standardized methods of determining MIC have been defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%