1993
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.57.2198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Method for Purification of Leukocidin and Gamma-Hemolysin Components fromStaphylococcus aureus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Purification of recombinant mutant proteins was carried out as described previously (Nariya et al ., 1993), except that the concentration of the washing and elution buffer for the Hydroxyapatite column was raised to 0.32 M and 0.8 M, respectively, to obtain pure double‐cysteine mutants. Protein concentration was measured by the method of Bradford using bovine serum albumin as a standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purification of recombinant mutant proteins was carried out as described previously (Nariya et al ., 1993), except that the concentration of the washing and elution buffer for the Hydroxyapatite column was raised to 0.32 M and 0.8 M, respectively, to obtain pure double‐cysteine mutants. Protein concentration was measured by the method of Bradford using bovine serum albumin as a standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…γ ‐Hemolysin was purified from the culture supernatant of Staphylococcus aureus 5R Smith strain as described previously [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Den-'sitometry for the protein bands indicated that the fractions 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 contained LukS and LukF in a molar ratio of 1.00 to O.98-1.03. These results suggested that the fractions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] contained Luk complexes of > 300, 300, 205, and 140 kDa, and that the Luk complexes were dissociated to monorneric LukS aRd LukF in a molar ratio of 1:1 upon heating at 1OOOC in the presence of 2% SDS. Immunoblot analysis showed that the fractions 1 1-・16 contained significant amounts of monomeric LukS and LukF but no large-molecular-sized complex of Luk (results not shown).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%