Building Integration Solutions 2006
DOI: 10.1061/40798(190)17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Methodologies for the Prediction of Footfall-Induced Vibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, different from the AISC Design Guide, RMS acceleration is adopted in the SCI Design Guide to quantify the acceleration response. The second approach "General Assessment of Establishing Vibration Response" is based on the method proposed by Willford et al [40] and Young [42], which is a frequency domain criterion of vibration serviceability specifically suitable for finite element programs. In their research, an enormous amount of footfall force was measured and the design value assigned as 75% of the fractile value of the statistical distribution.…”
Section: Sci Design Guidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, different from the AISC Design Guide, RMS acceleration is adopted in the SCI Design Guide to quantify the acceleration response. The second approach "General Assessment of Establishing Vibration Response" is based on the method proposed by Willford et al [40] and Young [42], which is a frequency domain criterion of vibration serviceability specifically suitable for finite element programs. In their research, an enormous amount of footfall force was measured and the design value assigned as 75% of the fractile value of the statistical distribution.…”
Section: Sci Design Guidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tested floor systems with relatively low natural frequencies, the predicted acceleration from both design guides is approximately 30% higher than the experimental one, and this difference varies case by case. Hicks also compared the measured results with the finite element modelling proposed by Willford et al [40] and found that the difference is widely dispersed, although the average ratio between the two sets of values were 0.98.…”
Section: Difference Between Predictions By Design Guides and Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For high‐frequency mode loading, the guidelines use variations of the impulse equation derived by Willford et al The impulse load varies between guidelines based on the coefficient to the equation. Willford et al proposed a coefficient of 54 for design. This coefficient has been adapted by CCIP‐016 and appears to assume a 700 N (157 lb) walker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A technical review of the microvibration sources, criteria, measurements, and mitigations can be found in reference [3]. Over the last two decades, micro-vibration has been intensively studied in concerns of human comfort and production yield for office buildings, biotechnology or metrology labs, and semiconductor fabs [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Vibration control for sensitive equipment by using isolation devices or active control systems [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] has also been widely explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%