2004
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved model core potentials for the second‐ and third‐row transition metals

Abstract: New nonrelativistic and scalar-relativistic pseudopotentials for the second- and third-row transition metals have been developed. These improved Model Core Potentials were used in calculations for a variety of transition metal complexes to test their ability to reproduce experimental structures and vibrational frequencies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometries were optimized using restricted B3LYP with the 6-31G* basis set for the main group elements. A scalar relativistic model core potential (first 30 electrons) was used for ruthenium, with the valence orbital set (5s and 4d) being of triple-zeta quality [46, 47]. Spherical harmonic d orbitals were used in all calculations and the default grid size was used for numerical integration in DFT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometries were optimized using restricted B3LYP with the 6-31G* basis set for the main group elements. A scalar relativistic model core potential (first 30 electrons) was used for ruthenium, with the valence orbital set (5s and 4d) being of triple-zeta quality [46, 47]. Spherical harmonic d orbitals were used in all calculations and the default grid size was used for numerical integration in DFT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current MCPs were parameterized using a scalar relativistic wavefunction, but our previous iMCPs [37][38][39] have both non-and scalar relativistic versions, and this would allow us to predict the effect of relativity on bond length and interaction energy. A sample calculation was done with XeAgCl.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-state gas-phase geometry optimization was performed at the Hartree-Fock level of theory (RHF, ROHF and UHF) using the SBKJC, Def2-TZVP, IMCP-NR1 and IMCP-SR1 basis sets. 31,32 The calculations were carried out using the GAMESS-US package 33 for the Def2-TZVP, IMCP-NR1 and IMCP-SR1 basis sets and FireFly version 8.1.1 34 for the SBKJC basic set. The effect of solvent (water) was taken into account in the framework of the polarizable continuum model (PCM).…”
Section: Quantum Chemical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%