2019
DOI: 10.9734/jamcs/2019/v33i430187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Model for Detecting Fake Profiles in Online Social Network: A Case Study of Twitter

Abstract: Online Social Network (OSN) is like a virtual community where people build social networks and relations with one another. The open access to the Internet has increased the growth of OSN which has attracted intruders to exploit the weaknesses of the Internet and OSN to their own gain. The rise in the usage of OSN has posed security threats to OSN users as they share personal and sensitive information online which could be exploited by these intruders by creating profiles to carry out a series of malicious acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding highlights the significant contribution of this study towards improving bot detection using unsupervised learning algorithms. RandomForest algorithm supervised 95 [23] Random Forest Accuracy supervised 98.42 [24] deep-learning model supervised 95 [22] honeypot model With supervised 85 [25] SVM, Naïve Bayes and Improved Support Vector Machine (ISVM) supervised 90 [26] Neural Network (RNN) supervised 92 [27] k-Nearest Neighbors supervised 93 [28] Random Forest supervised 57.139 The proposed method unsupervised 99.86…”
Section: Comparing the Results With A Supervised Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding highlights the significant contribution of this study towards improving bot detection using unsupervised learning algorithms. RandomForest algorithm supervised 95 [23] Random Forest Accuracy supervised 98.42 [24] deep-learning model supervised 95 [22] honeypot model With supervised 85 [25] SVM, Naïve Bayes and Improved Support Vector Machine (ISVM) supervised 90 [26] Neural Network (RNN) supervised 92 [27] k-Nearest Neighbors supervised 93 [28] Random Forest supervised 57.139 The proposed method unsupervised 99.86…”
Section: Comparing the Results With A Supervised Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the shortage of a corpus of deceptive news is the main challenge in this field for kinds of models to predict or detect. There are several ways to gather fake news: fake product reviews [21][22][23], fudged online resumes [24], opinion spamming [25][26][27], fake social network profiles [28][29][30], fake dating profiles [31], and forged scientific work. Some data are available but are restricted in content (e.g., to hotels and electronics reviews).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes two types of algorithms namely, linear and nonlinear techniques. However, the ideal feature extraction-based dimensionality reduction methods are principal component analysis (PCA) [28,29], statistic methods [11,30,31], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [32], and manually [18,19]. Here, seven out of twenty-six articles that include four parameters are discussed.…”
Section: The Features Extraction (Fe) Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detecting fraudulent accounts in online social networks and creating a model that can precisely describe fake profiles was performed using supervised machine learning techniques and an improved Support Vector Machine (SVM) [28]. The developed method yielded 90% of accuracy in comparison to the Support Vector Machine and Nave Bayes (NB) which achieved 77.4% and 77.3% respectively.…”
Section: The Features Extraction (Fe) Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation