2013
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved MRI quantification of spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis

Abstract: PSIR/ASM proved more reproducible than established methods of evaluating CSA in MS and also provides the lowest number of subjects per arm for 6-month and 1-year clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
73
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Image acquisition was successful in all subjects, and automated analysis provided robust readouts from multiple ROIs, with the results validated by acceptable reliability data. Our results establish normative data for CSA, FA, and MTR that are consistent with previous reports at 3T, 12,21,[27][28][29] in addition to our novel T2*WI WM/GM metric. T2*WI WM/GM, FA, and MTR all showed strong graywhite contrast and differences between individual WM tracts.…”
Section: Summary Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Image acquisition was successful in all subjects, and automated analysis provided robust readouts from multiple ROIs, with the results validated by acceptable reliability data. Our results establish normative data for CSA, FA, and MTR that are consistent with previous reports at 3T, 12,21,[27][28][29] in addition to our novel T2*WI WM/GM metric. T2*WI WM/GM, FA, and MTR all showed strong graywhite contrast and differences between individual WM tracts.…”
Section: Summary Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Reliability of the CSA measurement was not assessed due to time constraints, but it likely surpasses that of our other measures because it has been previously reported to have TRCOV under 0.5% by using similar techniques. 12 Reliability was greatest in the rostral region for all techniques, where healthy subjects and patients with DCM showed similar results. In contrast, patients with DCM showed trends toward diminished reliability at MCLs and caudal levels, likely related to distorted anatomy, increased partial volume effects, increased susceptibility artifacts, and less accurate registration to the SCT template.…”
Section: Summary Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cord compression causes ischemia that often represents partially reversible neurologic impairment, 30 whereas atrophy of the SC (rostral or caudal compression) suggests axonal loss or demyelination, which is more likely to be permanent. 12 MCL CSA has been previously demonstrated to correlate well with severity in DCM, 31 and atrophy measurement has also proved useful in DCM 12 and MS. [4][5][6] However, MCL CSA does not account for motion-related dynamic injury, which is also believed to be an important mechanism of tissue injury in DCM, 31 suggesting that this metric may be better used in conjunction with other measures that directly interrogate microstructural changes. FA showed strong group differences and moderate correlations with impairment, but diagnostic accuracy was modest.…”
Section: Summary Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The strongest results include cross-sectional area (CSA) as a measure of spinal cord atrophy, the DTI metric fractional anisotropy (FA) to evaluate axonal integrity, and the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) as a measure of demyelination. 3 Spinal cord CSA has shown moderate-to-strong correlation with disability in MS [4][5][6] but is a nonspecific measure of tissue injury and shows high intersubject variability in healthy subjects, 7,8 somewhat limiting its utility. FA has demonstrated moderate correlation with global and focal disability in dozens of studies involving various pathologies 3,[9][10][11][12][13][14] but has yet to achieve clinical uptake due to a lack of standardized/portable acquisition methods and cumbersome analysis techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%