2006
DOI: 10.1021/ci0601315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Naïve Bayesian Modeling of Numerical Data for Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion (ADME) Property Prediction

Abstract: We have implemented a naïve Bayesian classifier which models continuous numerical data using a Gaussian distribution. Several cases of interest in the area of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion prediction are presented which demonstrate that this approach is superior to the implementation of naïve Bayesian classifiers in which continuous chemical descriptors are modeled as binary data. We demonstrate that this enhanced performance, upon comparison with other implementations, is independent of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Bayesian classification methods have also been used for ADME/Tox models (36, 4749). Thus, using Bayesian models for hit follow-up outside of Mtb is worthy of further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Bayesian classification methods have also been used for ADME/Tox models (36, 4749). Thus, using Bayesian models for hit follow-up outside of Mtb is worthy of further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we have focused on Bayesian machine learning due to their processing speed and ease of use, many other algorithms exist that can be used for machine learning. SVM 4352 and Random Forests 5355 like Bayesian classification methods 5660 have also been used extensively for drug discovery and ADME/Tox models 31, 57, 61, 62 . For example, extensive evaluations of different machine learning methods and descriptors have been performed by Broccatelli et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian models were generated using Discovery Studio 2.1 (Accelrys, San Diego, CA) Laplacian-corrected Bayesian classifier [37],[42],[43],[45],[56]. FCFP_6 fingerprints, AlogP, molecular weight, number of rotatable bonds, number of rings, number of aromatic rings, number of hydrogen bond acceptors, number of hydrogen bond donors and molecular fractional polar surface area were calculated from the input sdf file using the “calculate molecular properties protocol”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%