2019
DOI: 10.1080/08123985.2019.1691441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved near-surface resolution in geotechnical applications using very early AEM time gates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high altitude (>300 m above ground) test flying was carried out at the beginning and at the end of each flight to measure the primary field response, that is, the effects of the instrument including the helicopter on the receiver coil. The high‐altitude primary field response was used to decouple the system response from the early time gates (∼1 μs) of low moment data (Auken et al., 2020; Skrudal et al., 2020). Thus, the low and the high moment measurements added to the system response decoupling from early gates facilitate usable TEM data starting from 4 to ∼10 μs that results into obtaining high‐resolution subsurface characteristics from very shallow to more than 250 m depth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high altitude (>300 m above ground) test flying was carried out at the beginning and at the end of each flight to measure the primary field response, that is, the effects of the instrument including the helicopter on the receiver coil. The high‐altitude primary field response was used to decouple the system response from the early time gates (∼1 μs) of low moment data (Auken et al., 2020; Skrudal et al., 2020). Thus, the low and the high moment measurements added to the system response decoupling from early gates facilitate usable TEM data starting from 4 to ∼10 μs that results into obtaining high‐resolution subsurface characteristics from very shallow to more than 250 m depth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, AEM has several limitations on its utility for ground investigations. First, the resolution is rather low and may not always be sufficient for all applications, though efforts are ongoing to extract early-time/high-frequency signal to improve near-surface resolution [66]. Second, accounting for 3D effects is computationally intensive, meaning that the most commonly used inversion schemes result in models with a high degree of lateral smoothing.…”
Section: Generalizations: Advantages and Limitations Of Aem For Ground Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-surface resolution can be further improved when methods are used to incorporate time gates that are either closer to the transmitter current shut-off or are in the on-time of the transmitting waveform. Guro Skurdal, Andi Pfaffhuber, Aaron Davis, and Sara Bezin show that early time gates can improve near-surface resolution in AEM data (Skurdal et al 2019); and Esben Auken, Nikolaj Fogel, Kristoffer Andersen, Niklas Nyboe, and Anders Christiansen demonstrate improved resolution using on-time data .…”
Section: Introduction Aaron Davismentioning
confidence: 99%