Chemical Methods 2022
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821931-7.00001-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved oil recovery by gel technology: Water shutoff and conformance control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 193 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This metric assesses how well the polymer is retained by comparing the ratio of pressure differentials after secondary water injection to that during the initial water injection before the introduction of the polymer, maintaining consistent flow rates, as detailed by Equation ( 2). The residual resistance factor is indicative of the extent to which the polymer has reduced permeability following secondary water injection [51] Resistance factor ¼ ΔP polymer ΔP waterflooding ¼ k water =μ water k polymer =μ polymer (1) Residual resistance factor ¼ ΔP postÀwaterflooding ΔP waterflooding ¼ k water =μ water k post-water =μ post-water (2) where the symbols "k" and "μ" represent the permeability and viscosity, respectively.…”
Section: Lmp Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This metric assesses how well the polymer is retained by comparing the ratio of pressure differentials after secondary water injection to that during the initial water injection before the introduction of the polymer, maintaining consistent flow rates, as detailed by Equation ( 2). The residual resistance factor is indicative of the extent to which the polymer has reduced permeability following secondary water injection [51] Resistance factor ¼ ΔP polymer ΔP waterflooding ¼ k water =μ water k polymer =μ polymer (1) Residual resistance factor ¼ ΔP postÀwaterflooding ΔP waterflooding ¼ k water =μ water k post-water =μ post-water (2) where the symbols "k" and "μ" represent the permeability and viscosity, respectively.…”
Section: Lmp Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reservoirs are among the special reservoirs that change the fluid flow regime of the reservoirs and affect the well productivity (Yang et al, 2018;Radwan et al, 2021). Sometimes, in some areas, the presence of deep fractures causes water conning in these areas, and undesirable fluids flow to less permeable areas, where they are wasted in the subsurface (Ali et al, 2021;Sadeghnejad et al, 2022). Many techniques have been used to identify fracture density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the technique of working with pressure has been thoroughly researched and widely used 21–23 . Currently, the commonly used temporary plugging technology with pressure operation can be mainly divided into: mechanical temporary plugging technology 24,25 and chemical temporary plugging technology 26–29 . Chemical temporary plugging technology is widely used because of its good plugging effect, low cost, low risk, and other advantages 30–32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Currently, the commonly used temporary plugging technology with pressure operation can be mainly divided into: mechanical temporary plugging technology 24,25 and chemical temporary plugging technology. [26][27][28][29] Chemical temporary plugging technology is widely used because of its good plugging effect, low cost, low risk, and other advantages. [30][31][32] By injecting a certain amount of working fluid at the wellhead, spontaneous gel formation under downhole temperature and pressure conditions, forming a plugging agent, effectively preventing the formation fluid from gushing out and massive leakage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%