2000
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200004271-00170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Outcome in Renal Transplant Recipients Treated With Simulect Versus Okt3 Induction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equine antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is uncommonly used nowadays, and the single study in which basiliximab was compared with this drug (Sollinger et al 2001) will not be discussed further, other than to note that the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection was similar between the two groups. Comparing muromonab CD3 and basiliximab, one large study with 271 patients (Pelletier et al 2000) found no differences in acute rejection between treatment groups, but three other studies with a total of 368 patients (Chowdhury et al 2001;Kumar et al 2001;Kode et al 2003) reported that basiliximab was associated with lower incidences of acute rejection than muromonab CD3 and fewer adverse advents. Five-year follow-up is available from one single-center study (Shoskes et al 2006) in which 52 recipients were randomized to receive OKT3 or basiliximab; the incidence of acute rejection was similar between the two groups during the fi ve-year period.…”
Section: Basiliximab Vs Other Inducing Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equine antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is uncommonly used nowadays, and the single study in which basiliximab was compared with this drug (Sollinger et al 2001) will not be discussed further, other than to note that the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection was similar between the two groups. Comparing muromonab CD3 and basiliximab, one large study with 271 patients (Pelletier et al 2000) found no differences in acute rejection between treatment groups, but three other studies with a total of 368 patients (Chowdhury et al 2001;Kumar et al 2001;Kode et al 2003) reported that basiliximab was associated with lower incidences of acute rejection than muromonab CD3 and fewer adverse advents. Five-year follow-up is available from one single-center study (Shoskes et al 2006) in which 52 recipients were randomized to receive OKT3 or basiliximab; the incidence of acute rejection was similar between the two groups during the fi ve-year period.…”
Section: Basiliximab Vs Other Inducing Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%