2008
DOI: 10.17487/rfc5236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Packet Reordering Metrics

Abstract: Improved Packet Reordering Metrics Status of This MemoThis memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. IESG NoteThe content of this RFC was at one time considered by the IETF, and therefore it may resemble a current IETF work in progress or a published IETF work. The IETF standard for reordering metrics is RFC 4737. The metrics in this document were not adopted for inclusion in RFC 4737. This RFC is not a ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that paper it was shown experimentally that Restored is able to recover several measures of quality of service, among them the following metric [10].…”
Section: Explaining Restored Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In that paper it was shown experimentally that Restored is able to recover several measures of quality of service, among them the following metric [10].…”
Section: Explaining Restored Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Theorem 1 forces us to reevaluate the real-life applicability of this simple example: since the vast majority of traces used in the experimental benchmarking from [9] had SUS ≤ 3 the "theoretical" inconsistency of RD displayed by the example in Observation 2 is less stringent "in practice": in particular since no two permutations map to the same reordering pattern and, crucially, repeat packets are discarded before computing RD [10], it is no longer that surprising that RD could be largely consistent "in real life", even though theoretically inconsistent.…”
Section: Definition 7 Reorder Density (Rd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was first introduced by Piratla et al [133] and later specified in RFC 5236 [85]. To compute the reorder density M RD , the sequence number of each packet is compared to the position in which it arrived at the destination.…”
Section: Reorder Density and Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to measure the incidence and relevance of the reorderings observed in our tests, we use the metrics proposed in RFC 5236 [12] and in [21], adapting them to the needs of our specific application when necessary.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%