2010
DOI: 10.1021/pr100648r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Peptide Identification for Proteomic Analysis Based on Comprehensive Characterization of Electron Transfer Dissociation Spectra

Abstract: In recent years, electron transfer dissociation (ETD) has enjoyed widespread applications from sequencing of peptides with or without post-translational modifications to top-down analysis of intact proteins. However, peptide identification rates from ETD spectra compare poorly with those from collision induced dissociation (CID) spectra, especially for doubly charged precursors. This is in part due to an insufficient understanding of the characteristics of ETD and consequently a failure of database search engi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, the strong dependence of ion fragment types on peptide size should also be introduced in such models. Furthermore, the methodology presented in this work will now be applied to other fragmentation spectra, and most relevantly to ETD fragmentation: comparison of the ECD and ETD fragmentation behavior both for specific peptides and for entire fragmentation datasets [49] could lead to further knowledge on the similarities and differences between these two kin activation methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the strong dependence of ion fragment types on peptide size should also be introduced in such models. Furthermore, the methodology presented in this work will now be applied to other fragmentation spectra, and most relevantly to ETD fragmentation: comparison of the ECD and ETD fragmentation behavior both for specific peptides and for entire fragmentation datasets [49] could lead to further knowledge on the similarities and differences between these two kin activation methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragmentation spectra of modified peptides were interpreted manually. ETD fragment ions were assigned as c and z ions (including related z +H ions) (42). The relative abundance of methylation of ETFβ was determined by analysis of an AspN-generated peptide (EPRYATLPNIMKAKKKKI) that contains both methylated lysine residues.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 Postreaction activation of ETnoD products with gentle collisions (termed ETcaD) produces more extensive and intense fragment ions from N−Cα backbone cleavages for peptide cations, but many fragments generated have skewed isotope distributions due to hydrogen abstractions. 29,33,34 Ideally then, activation would be applied concurrently with the ETD reaction; collisional activation of the precursor ions, however, requires resonant excitation during ETD, increasing the velocity of the ions and inhibiting ion−ion reactions. 35−37 Instead, we have introduced a viable alternative, IR photon (10.6 μm) irradiation concurrent to the ETD reaction, termed activated ion ETD (AI-ETD), and have shown the benefits it affords peptide fragmentation for shotgun analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%