2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0033822200057830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Precision of Radiocarbon Measurements for CH4 and CO2 Using GC and Continuous-Flow AMS Achieved by Summation of Repeated Injections

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Compound specific radiocarbon measurements can be made instantaneously using a gas chromatograph (GC) combustion system coupled to a 14 C AMS system fitted with a gas ion source. Samples below 10 µg C can be analyzed but the precision is reduced to 5-10% because of lower source efficiency. We modified our GC for CH 4 and CO 2 analysis and injected samples multiple times to sum data and increase precision. We attained a maximum precision of 0.6% for modern CO 2 from 25 injections of 27 µg C and a back… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26]), and for gaseous carbon samples (e.g. [27,28]). In order to estimate the limit of sample size, it is convenient to start with a sample of 1 mg C with a modern 14 C/ 12 C isotopic ratio of 1.2 × 10 −12 .…”
Section: Reduction Of Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[26]), and for gaseous carbon samples (e.g. [27,28]). In order to estimate the limit of sample size, it is convenient to start with a sample of 1 mg C with a modern 14 C/ 12 C isotopic ratio of 1.2 × 10 −12 .…”
Section: Reduction Of Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going below 10-μg C reduces the statistical uncertainty correspondingly, but the real limitations are uncertainties from various background sources [26]. The direct use of CO 2 gas in the sputter ion source [27,28] avoids the graphitization step for solid C targets [26] and thus reduces the procedural uncertainty. However, the ionization yield for C − production is considerably lower from CO 2 gas (~ factor of 10), and finite memory effects are another problem to be addressed.…”
Section: Reduction Of Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation