2018
DOI: 10.1101/250464
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved prediction of fungal effector proteins from secretomes with EffectorP 2.0

Abstract: 4Plant-pathogenic fungi secrete effector proteins to facilitate infection. We describe extensive improvements to 1 5EffectorP, the first machine learning classifier for fungal effector prediction. EffectorP 2.0 is now trained on a larger 1 6 set of effectors and utilizes a different approach based on an ensemble of classifiers trained on different subsets of 1 7 negative data, offering different views on classification. EffectorP 2.0 achieves accuracy of 89%, compared to 82% for 1 8 EffectorP 1.0 and 59.8% for… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore used a heuristic and HMM search to identify initial candidates for RxLRs and CRN. For SSPs we used EffectorP2.0 [52]. Because these are secreted, cytoplasmic effectors we further determined candidate genes without a transmembrane domain (TM domain) and with a SP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore used a heuristic and HMM search to identify initial candidates for RxLRs and CRN. For SSPs we used EffectorP2.0 [52]. Because these are secreted, cytoplasmic effectors we further determined candidate genes without a transmembrane domain (TM domain) and with a SP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subcellular localization was predicted using WoLF PSORT v0.1 (Horton et al, ), specifying “plant organism” for secreted predicted proteins and “fungi organism” for those not predicted as part of the secretome. Putative effectors were traced using the EffectorP v2.0 tool with a score >0.55 (Sperschneider, Dodds, Gardiner, Singh, & Taylor, ). GO annotation was performed using HMMER 3.1b2 (February 2015) by comparison of protein sequences with HMM PFAM‐A database (01/2017; P value <0.01; dom‐evalue <0.01).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secretome of Fg was inferred from a previous report 73 . Putative effector proteins were predicted using EffectorP2 with default settings 74 . To identify secreted peptidases, sequences of the predicted secreted proteins were subjected to a local BLASTP database based on MEROPS 75 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%