2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved predictions of wellhead choke liquid critical-flow rates: Modelling based on hybrid neural network training learning based optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Artificial intelligence algorithms have been extensively applied for predicting flow rates through wellhead chokes (Elhaj et al, 2015;Choubineh et al, 2017). For the dataset evaluated here, there are 180 (M = 180) data records and four variables (N = 4) defining the system, with the dependent variable being the fifth variable.…”
Section: Dataset 1 (Prediction Of Loss Circulation While Drilling)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Artificial intelligence algorithms have been extensively applied for predicting flow rates through wellhead chokes (Elhaj et al, 2015;Choubineh et al, 2017). For the dataset evaluated here, there are 180 (M = 180) data records and four variables (N = 4) defining the system, with the dependent variable being the fifth variable.…”
Section: Dataset 1 (Prediction Of Loss Circulation While Drilling)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other machine learning techniques including support vector machine (SVM) (Cortes and Vapnik, 1995), least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) (Suykens and Vandewalle, 1999), and fuzzy logic combinations with ANN such as Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) (Sugeno and Kang, 1988;Jang, 1993) of transparency has not inhibited these algorithms from being widely and successfully applied, often hybridized with various optimization algorithms, to improve predictions from various oil, gas and other industrial systems (Li et al, 2013;Meng and Zhao, 2015;Zamani et al, 2015;Choubineh et al, 2017;Yavari et al, 2018). Indeed, there is a growing body of research in the petroleum sector that enters dataset records with multiple variables into opaquely coded soft-computing machine learning and neural network functions (MatLab, in particular), blindly accepting the results in many cases without even checking the veracity of the input data values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used a hybrid model of an artificial network with a teaching learning based optimization to predict oil flowrate in chokes. 22 R 2 of their method is equal to 0.981. Although these methods can predict flowrate with more accuracy, they cannot be employed easily, therefore developing a new correlation with flexible form is vital for oil and gas fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indicating more accurate results than the previously published correlations. More recently, Choubineh et al . developed a hybrid version of training learning‐based optimization and ANNs for estimating choke liquid rate in critical state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a least-square SVM model with five input parameters were developed by Baghban et al [2] indicating more accurate results than the previously published correlations. More recently, Choubineh et al [38] developed a hybrid version of training learning-based optimization and ANNs for estimating choke liquid rate in critical state. For enhancing their model performance, the authors have considered the impact of three extra input variables including temperature and oil and gas-specific densities in their model in addition to the choke size, gas-to-liquid ratio, and wellhead pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%