2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11241-010-9106-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved priority assignment for global fixed priority pre-emptive scheduling in multiprocessor real-time systems

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
144
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. This is similar to the concept of carry-in interference used in the analysis of global multiprocessor fixed-priority scheduling (Bertogna and Cirinei 2007;Davis and Burns 2010). Effectively due to local interference from higher priority tasks on its core, the memory accesses of the first job are carried-in to the interval of interest leading to increased interference on the bus during the interval.…”
Section: Interference On the Busmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2. This is similar to the concept of carry-in interference used in the analysis of global multiprocessor fixed-priority scheduling (Bertogna and Cirinei 2007;Davis and Burns 2010). Effectively due to local interference from higher priority tasks on its core, the memory accesses of the first job are carried-in to the interval of interest leading to increased interference on the bus during the interval.…”
Section: Interference On the Busmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thereafter, for every task (Lines 13-17). Then, it repeats this process until there is no slack value update (τ is deemed schedulable) (Lines [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or there exists at least one task τ j satisfying R j > D j (τ is deemed unschedulable) (Lines 10-11).…”
Section: Is Deemed Schedulable) or There Is No Slack Value Update (τ mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the real-time systems community has developed various techniques for guaranteeing timing requirements, and RTA (Response Time Analysis) is one of the most popular techniques. Starting with FP (Fixed priority) [2] on uniprocessors [3], the generic RTA framework has been extended to multiprocessor systems for popular scheduling algorithms [4]- [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These tests are described in more detail by Davis and Burns (2010a). Bertogna et al (2009) developed a polynomial time sufficient schedulability test for global FP scheduling based on the approach of Baker (2003).…”
Section: Schedulability Tests For Global Fpmentioning
confidence: 99%